Please consider the following two quotes that I believe capture
Delpit’s main points from the two essays in this reading segment:
The Vilis Tokples
Schools of Papua New Guinea - “…when
the policy reflects the goals of the people it is to affect…and when it reaffirms
rather than negates a people’s knowledge of its culture and heritage, then
there is no better prospect for its success.”
“Hello, Grandfather”
– “…successful teachers of Native Alaskan children found ways to contextualize
the literate endeavors and to celebrate, rather than limit, the sense of
connectedness which the children brought to school.”
Reading between the lines of feedback I got from some
parents last year, I would suggest there is a contingent of the community that
believes we do more to “negate” than we do to “reaffirm” the culture and heritage
of the students we serve. And, it was
often implied that some of our practices limit “the sense of connectedness”
students have with their community.
As you respond, please attempt to do one of the following by July 8th –
1) Reflect on our school’s practices through the lens of the
students/families we serve and support the claims above – that we do more to negate
than we do to reaffirm and that we limit the sense of connectedness students
have with their community.
2) Defend our
practices by providing examples of how we reaffirm the culture and heritage of
the students we serve and/or celebrate the sense of connectedness students have
with their community.